There have been several people who claim that they had really seen the 'Loch Ness Monster'. Some of the witnesses convey that they saw the monster crawling on the shore. Various theories have been came out to explain reports in Loch Ness about the mysterious 'Loch ness Monster'.

Some claim that there is nothing called 'Loch Ness monster' and they justify by saying that there are several fictional crypto writers who propose a multi-dimensional or supernatural origin to certain sightings and 'Loch ness Monster' is one amongst that. Some even claim that it's a hoax supported with fake photos and false reports. But it does not cover the numerous reports from reliable witnesses who still claim to have seen a moving animal on the loch's surface.

The evidence for the Loch Ness monster is pretty much the same as all other cryptozoological creatures. Although sightings go back hundreds of years there are a few photos which puts us in dilemma. Lack of evidence of course doesn’t disprove the existence monster, but it makes it less likely. Currently there is no evidence for any monster in Loch Ness or any other lake, although that does not mean there is absolutely nothing in the stories. Most of the evidence has crumbled so it looks unlikely.

The trouble with most of the mysteries is that the closer we get to them, the less real they become unless we have brain washed ourselves into accepting the filmiest evidence and do not understand scientific methodology. Unfortunately, the simplest explanation often appears as the correct one to most of us. At the same time there is a lot that we still do not know, or ever will know about the natural world which is mysterious and it's possible variety.